Saturday, June 7, 2025

Bob Fergeson - The Little Man

 




From early morning coffee
to late night herbal tea,
We lived for near forever,
the Little Man and me.

When first I came to travel
in this classroom wide and grand,
I knew nothing of the coming
 of this lonely Little Man.

But parents, teachers, doctors,
the whole damn Helping Herd,
Soon created him inside me,
As their ancestors had insured.
He has no real existence,
None that I can see.
But could and should and would!
Screamed the Little Man in me.

Soon I hid myself in pride,
Found that fear blocked every door.
I was now what I despised!
Just as those that'd gone before.

The hypnosis worked it's magic,
No peace had I, no stand.
Just a mis-identification,
I became the Little Man.
I took him for a person,
Hell, I thought that he was me!
He sure could be convincing,
that Little Man in me.


Then one day it happened,
I know not really why,
I looked out there below me
From some Great Eternal Sky.
He didn't even notice,
So busy as a bee,
He just kept right on sleeping, but
that Little Man ain't me!

One day looking in the mirror,
From my bed as I did stand,
I receded back behind him,
that sleeping Little Man.
He didn't even notice,
Just a grain lost in the sand,
He can't look back and see me,
that lonely Little Man.

I watch him and his pattern,
How he blends right in so well,
That his life and his surroundings
are no different from himself.
He has no greater vision,
Desire and fear are all he sees.
An actor in the TV,
that Little Man in me.


It's a sad but true short story,
I cry a tear, and so does he,
He won't survive, he lives to die,
the Little Man in me.





www.spiritualteachers


conscious tv



Friday, June 6, 2025

Metameza Ushi - Default Mode Network

 



WAKING FROM THE AUTOPILOT of “ME”: 
The Illusion of the I-Thought and the Default 
Mode Network ("DMN")

In the quiet hum of the mind, beneath the endless inner dialogue and habitual patterns of thought, there pulses a silent question: What am I, really? 

For millennia, sages and mystics have turned inward to investigate the roots of identity, emerging with a radical claim: the "self" that we believe ourselves to be is not a solid, lasting thing. It is, instead, a thought. More precisely, it is the I-thought;  a mental construct that arises again and again, forming the scaffolding of the ego.

This ancient insight, drawn from traditions like Advaita Vedanta, Zen, and the teachings of Ramana Maharshi, finds a surprising resonance 
in the discoveries of modern neuroscience, particularly in what is known as the Default Mode Network (DMN).

The “I-Thought”: Seed of Illusion

Ramana Maharshi described the ego, the false 
self, as arising from the first thought: “I.” This “I-thought” is not our true nature (the unchanging awareness behind all thoughts), but rather a mental formation that latches onto body, memories, sensations and roles, declaring: 
“I am this.” Every time we say, “I am angry,” 
“I am afraid,” “I am important,” or “I am unworthy,” we reinforce the fiction that a stable, separate “me” exists and owns these experiences.

Yet, this “me” is just a phantom; a string of thoughts appearing in consciousness, mistaking itself for the owner of consciousness.

Enter the Default Mode Network, a constellation 
of brain regions, including the medial prefrontal cortex and posterior cingulate cortex,  that activate when the mind is at rest, not engaged
in specific goal-directed tasks. 

The DMN is involved in self-referential thinking, including autobiographical memory, imagining
the future, judging others’ intentions, and mind-wandering.

What neuroscience has found is that this network hums with activity during the very moments when our inner narrator is loudest. It is the neurological correlate of the I-thought, the story-spinning mechanism that creates the illusion of a continuous self.

In spiritual terms, the DMN is the neural basis of the egoic mind. It’s what keeps us on autopilot : reacting, projecting, reliving, anticipating; all through the lens of “me and mine.” It is not inherently bad; it’s a functional tool. But when
left unexamined, it becomes a prison.

Awakening: The Deconstruction of Autopilot Identity

To awaken, in the Buddhist sense of the word,
is to wake up from the trance of the DMN, to disidentify from the I-thought, and to recognize 
the silent, observing awareness in which all thoughts appear and disappear.

Through mindfulness meditation, self-inquiry, 
and contemplative presence we can reduce DMN activity. In this quieting, there is space. And in that space, the illusion of the little self begins to dissolve, lighten and thin out.

This is why many spiritual traditions speak of awakening not as gaining something new, but as uncovering what has always been. 

The “you” that you thought you were: the name, the role, the personality is all seen as a pattern, 
not Presence. The Awareness that remains is not 
a thing, not a person. It is NO ONE and EVERYONE, a vast stillness that observes without grasping.

To be a Buddha is not to become divine in some abstract way. It just means “the awakened one” - awakened from the dream of self, the illusion of separateness.
 
It is to wake up from the DMN’s hypnotic loop, to see through the I-thought, and to live freely in the freshness of each moment.

The irony is that the moment we seek enlightenment as “me,” we are still within the DMN loop. 

The very act of seeking presupposes a seeker; a "me" that must attain something. But when this is seen clearly, the seeking drops away, and what remains is simple Presence - aware, unattached, not a thought but the space in which thought appears.

So what does it mean to live without the I-thought dominating experience?

It means no longer being enslaved by the voice in the head that says: “I must succeed,” “I am not enough,” or “This should not be happening to me.” 

It means allowing thoughts to arise without believing them to define a permanent (i)dentity. 
It means resting as the witness; the Pure Awareness that never comes and goes.

To be clear, this doesn't mean the self vanishes in some dissociative way. It means the illusion of its solidity collapses, and with that collapse comes the loss of self-centeredness, the loss self-ishness, and the realization of the freedom, spontaneity and compassion that is Ever-Present. 

The “me” that once felt so threatened and separate is seen as a kind of useful fiction; a character, not the author.

In the end, the “me” is a story the mind tells itself, and the DMN is its narrator. The I-thought is the seed, the ego its sprout, and suffering its fruit.

To wake up: to be Buddha is to see the story for what it is, and no longer be bound by it. We don’t need to kill the narrator. We simply need to stop confusing the story with our true and essential nature.

You were never the I-thought.
You are the Silence that hears it.
















Sunday, June 1, 2025

Emily Snow - Awareness (2)

 

Q&A: 'YOU DON'T NEED TO LOCATE AWARENESS' 


Awareness isn’t something acquired or observed - it’s the formless presence already here before all thought, experience, or identity. 

It is not a state, not a feeling, not a thing at all, but That makes knowing possible. While experience is fleeting, layered, and nameable, awareness remains silent, changeless, invisible and indivisible. Trying to grasp 'it' misses the point; resting as It reveals all.


Objection 1:

“If awareness can’t be seen or grasped, how can I even know it’s real?”


Response:

Because you are it. The fact that you can ask this question points to awareness already functioning - a silent knowing. You cannot see it as an object, as it is the Seeing itself.


Objection 2:

“Isn’t awareness just another subtle mental state?”


Response:

No. All mental states arise in awareness. Awareness isn’t something that changes - it’s That which allows change to be noticed. Thoughts, feelings, moods, and sensations come and go, but the noticing of these does not.


Objection 3:

“If I can’t feel it or describe it, what’s the use of it?”


Response:

Its usefulness lies not in utility - but in truth. Once you recognise awareness being what you are, suffering rooted in identification dissolves. It’s not about feeling something - it’s about ceasing to identify with a this or that.


Objection 4:

“It sounds too abstract. Isn’t this just philosophy?”


Response:

It’s actually fundamental reality, direct experience, not some philosophy of the mind. All experiences occur within its Knowing, but we overlook what’s constant in our attempt and keep chasing that which changes.


Objection 5:

“Isn’t this the same as being mindful or present?”


Response:

Mindfulness is a practice. Awareness is prior—even to the presumption of a 'someone' who practices. You don’t need to generate presence; just recognise the indisputable presence of presence.


Objection 6:

“I still feel like a person experiencing awareness.”


Response:

That’s the subtle illusion. That termed ‘person’ appears in awareness - not the other way around. Look closely. Can you actually find the boundary where some 'you' ends, and awareness begins?


Objection 7:

“Sometimes I feel it, but then I lose it.”


Response:

Awareness is never lost - only attention moved. What notices the feeling of gain or loss? That noticing hasn’t gone anywhere. It’s not a state that comes and goes.


Objection 8:

“It seems passive. Don’t I need to do something with it?”


Response:

Awareness doesn’t need 'someone's' doing - it’s not an activity. An impulse 'to do' arises within it. The deepest insight isn’t in doing anything, but just realising that you are It.


Objection 9:

“Is this just a clever way of escaping life’s problems?”


Response:

No. It’s the very opposite. It’s the end of escapism. Awareness meets everything directly, without filters, without resistance. The idea of ‘problems’ is simply an idea appearing within the open field of Awareness.


Objection 10:

“But I’m still suffering in this life - doesn’t that mean I’m not resting as awareness?”


Response:

Suffering arises once you identify with what awareness witnesses. Resting as awareness doesn’t remove sensations - it removes the false belief that you are fundamentally what is suffering.


In Conclusion:

You don’t need to find awareness - it’s not elsewhere. It’s not earnt nor added. It’s that which is aware when one is seeking, questioning, doubting, and longing. It doesn’t change with mood or thought. It’s not improved by effort nor diminished by confusion. It simply is.

The invitation is not to chase awareness as an object, but to stop and notice what has always been here - a silent, endless, formless, whole. 

Resting as that is not escapism - it is fully participating in reality, without some 'someone' clinging to what passes or resisting what is. Nothing more is needed. Nothing has ever been missing.

........................................................

“That which is, is always present. It is not known by effort, but by being still.” ~  Ramana Maharshi, Talks with Sri Ramana Maharshi

Awareness is not found through doing, but through abiding in silence.

........................................................

“There is nothing to attain, for you are already that which you seek.” ~ Nisargadatta Maharaj, 'I Am That'.

The seeker is itself the sought - stop seeking, and that becomes clear.

.........................................................

“Awareness is not something you become -it is what you are before becoming anything.” ~ Rupert Spira, Being Aware of Being Aware